From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16048 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 2003 12:39:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16041 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2003 12:39:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bilbo.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.18) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 1 Mar 2003 12:39:36 -0000 Received: from zaretsky ([80.230.235.222]) by bilbo.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.2.2-GA) with ESMTP id AHL87364; Sat, 1 Mar 2003 14:39:32 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 12:39:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: brobecker@gnat.com Message-Id: <4331-Sat01Mar2003143525+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20030301003358.GB11181@gnat.com> (message from Joel Brobecker on Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:33:58 -0800) Subject: Re: [RFC] Add new command to spit out the linetable for a given file Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20030301003358.GB11181@gnat.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00005.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:33:58 -0800 > From: Joel Brobecker > > (gdb) info sloc > 0x1234 1 > 0x1238 2 > 0x1239 1 > 0x123d 3 > ... > > This shouldn't be too hard to implement, and should help GVD a lot. > What do you think? FWIW, I don't see anything wrong with adding such a command. Please don't forget the appropriate doco patch if you do.