From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29538 invoked by alias); 22 Aug 2005 11:53:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29487 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Aug 2005 11:53:27 -0000 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 11:53:27 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j7MBrPQb025912; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 07:53:25 -0400 Received: from pobox.surrey.redhat.com (pobox.surrey.redhat.com [172.16.10.17]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j7MBrJV12913; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 07:53:24 -0400 Received: from [172.31.0.98] (vpn-68-4.surrey.redhat.com [10.32.68.4]) by pobox.surrey.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j7MBrH0l032589; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 12:53:17 +0100 Message-ID: <4309BE5A.8020503@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:07:00 -0000 From: Nick Clifton User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Kettenis CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gcc-patches@gcc.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Add some VAX floating point formats to floatformat.[ch] References: <200508212153.j7LLrJXJ006901@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <43098730.3060802@redhat.com> <4393.192.87.1.200.1124706151.squirrel@192.87.1.200> In-Reply-To: <4393.192.87.1.200.1124706151.squirrel@192.87.1.200> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-08/txt/msg00225.txt.bz2 Hi Mark, >>>+ /* VAX byte order. */ >>>+ floatformat_vax >> >>I think that having a more descriptive comment for the VAX byte order >>would be helpful. eg describing the layout of 1.2345678e10 as is done >>with the other entries in this enum. > > Could do that, although it wouldn't be particular useful. VAX is not quite > IEEE, so the bytes will be completely different, not just shuffled around. Ok well then how about the comment containing a quick precis of the VAX format. I am sure that various people will be interested to read it. Cheers Nick