From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22932 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2017 10:10:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 22875 invoked by uid 89); 3 Jan 2017 10:10:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=approve X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: foss.arm.com Received: from foss.arm.com (HELO foss.arm.com) (217.140.101.70) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 10:09:59 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4910C707; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 02:09:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.2.206.198] (e104437-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.2.206.198]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 891173F24D; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 02:09:57 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [1/9][RFC][DWARF] Reserve three DW_OP numbers in vendor extension space References: <72418e98-a400-c503-e8ce-c3fbe1ecc4a7@foss.arm.com> <20161111193859.GJ3541@tucnak.redhat.com> <20161115161817.GL3541@tucnak.redhat.com> <5896be40-51de-55f7-f4a1-4c5af7ff9aec@foss.arm.com> <1479304496.14569.256.camel@redhat.com> <20161116140218.GU3541@tucnak.redhat.com> <07b84003-4e73-8a7f-f949-4c3500e4ffc4@foss.arm.com> Cc: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" , Nick Clifton To: GDB , Binutils From: Jiong Wang Message-ID: <42e05bed-4819-3acb-1e3c-8982910e875f@foss.arm.com> Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 10:10:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-01/txt/msg00006.txt.bz2 On 28/12/16 19:54, Cary Coutant wrote: >> OK on this proposal and to install this patch to gcc trunk? >> >> Hi GDB, Binutils maintainer: >> >> OK on this proposal and install this patch to binutils-gdb master? >> >> include/ >> 2016-11-29 Richard Earnshaw >> Jiong Wang >> >> * dwarf2.def (DW_OP_AARCH64_operation): Reserve the number 0xea. > This is OK, but: > > +/* AARCH64 extensions. > + DW_OP_AARCH64_operation takes one mandatory unsigned LEB128 operand. > + Bits[6:0] of this operand is the action code, all others bits are > initialized > + to 0 except explicitly documented for one action. Please refer > AArch64 DWARF > + ABI documentation for details. */ > > Is it possible to include a stable URL that points to the ABI document? > > -cary As this patch has got approve from GCC, is it OK to install into binutils-gdb master? My understanding is "include/dwarf2.def" is shared between GDB and Binutils. This patch and the described AArch64 DWARF proposal has got GDB ack from https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2016-11/msg01008.html which, from my understanding, is a conditional approval given there is follow up GDB patches on multiplexing DW_CFA_GNU_window_save. This patch still need Binutils approval. Thanks. Regards, Jiong