From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id dkhfAykvfWL05AUAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 12 May 2022 12:00:41 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 011121E220; Thu, 12 May 2022 12:00:40 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=TuJP6h5O; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22E5F1E00D for ; Thu, 12 May 2022 12:00:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93804383D800 for ; Thu, 12 May 2022 16:00:39 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 93804383D800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1652371239; bh=ih1VHZlN2ndYISL53Zmu+fPrF1dUj7vXHANVvCxK1qM=; h=To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=TuJP6h5OosVT6O+qZ8C3cQZM1UQyQ8z/RIduDjw5nu1bmFNnIxVLPWGTaQccOu6+O CZ8i6ByfTxM/gHGdSWvGV29LutY6Cjm4SS+YUgHGvdN1PNp8QKb/BTPPAZJppvck4m gD6ZomkiVpwXe5uT0iwv/aD7ocDODw5/CdDCL4Pk= Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 795923848596 for ; Thu, 12 May 2022 16:00:19 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 795923848596 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 24CFvFi5028827; Thu, 12 May 2022 16:00:13 GMT Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3g15aug1yc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 12 May 2022 16:00:12 +0000 Received: from m0098416.ppops.net (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 24CFvSE2029362; Thu, 12 May 2022 16:00:12 GMT Received: from ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com (ba.79.3fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.63.121.186]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3g15aug1xx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 12 May 2022 16:00:12 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 24CFlB4j003938; Thu, 12 May 2022 16:00:11 GMT Received: from b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.25]) by ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3fwgd9vd1b-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 12 May 2022 16:00:11 +0000 Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.109]) by b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 24CG0BaP21889290 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 12 May 2022 16:00:11 GMT Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55448112061; Thu, 12 May 2022 16:00:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9061611206B; Thu, 12 May 2022 16:00:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-e362e14c-2378-11b2-a85c-87d605f3c641.ibm.com (unknown [9.211.152.172]) by b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2022 16:00:10 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <42a431bab647143333a1ea784f528a5d8db3d94f.camel@us.ibm.com> To: Kevin Buettner , cel@us.ibm.com Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 09:00:09 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20220511154822.3b9f7d74@f35-zws-1> References: <76bea9ad010a71ea5e2c7fd78f818bdb399810a6.camel@us.ibm.com> <20220506110826.5e16c8b6@f35-zws-1> <70a877cc-2f35-3924-6717-9d519c2730c5@palves.net> <099c8f8d8729a0051f83a034d62c18f03c789167.camel@vnet.ibm.com> <37d2a4b6a57b62662f0417f123bda6ba48066554.camel@vnet.ibm.com> <998d3f4859f16b73afd5103b682246643fef6d42.camel@us.ibm.com> <20220511154822.3b9f7d74@f35-zws-1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-18.el8) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: dtAKDEBgXEksBD9PR_8o-PvSp62368DE X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: eUoF1rqIzUGhSLxgOB_onSVnygD4j_aG Subject: RE: [PATCH V3] PowerPC: fix for gdb.base/eh_return.exp X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.858,Hydra:6.0.486,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-05-12_12,2022-05-12_01,2022-02-23_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2205120075 X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Carl Love via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Carl Love Cc: Rogerio Alves , Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" Kevin: On Wed, 2022-05-11 at 15:48 -0700, Kevin Buettner wrote: > On Wed, 11 May 2022 14:52:32 -0700 > Carl Love wrote: > > > + # Disable the Traceback Table generation, using the PowerPC > > specific > > + # gcc option, so the test gdb_test_multiple "disassemble eh2" > > will match > > What happens when some compiler other than gcc is used to run the > test? Good question. I hadn't considered other compilers that might be use. Guess I am a little to Linux centered. So far, it looks like AIX, xlC compiler uses -qtable=none, the LLVM compiler uses -mllvm -xcoff- traceback-table=false, don't know about clang yet. So, looks like the test is going to need to check for Power, then walk thru the possible compilers to set the needed option. Carl