From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11380 invoked by alias); 18 Jul 2005 14:34:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11032 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jul 2005 14:33:49 -0000 Received: from dumbledore.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.11) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 14:33:49 +0000 Received: (qmail 5592 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2005 14:33:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.101?) (mitchell@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 18 Jul 2005 14:33:16 -0000 Message-ID: <42DBBDA8.5000602@codesourcery.com> Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 14:34:00 -0000 From: Mark Mitchell User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christopher Faylor CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, chet.ramey@case.edu, Mark Kettenis Subject: Re: Guidance re. MinGW and readline References: <42DAF4FE.3060609@codesourcery.com> <200507180621.j6I6L9WO005075@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20050718135801.GA17333@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> In-Reply-To: <20050718135801.GA17333@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00147.txt.bz2 Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 08:21:09AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > >> Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 17:17:02 -0700 >> From: Mark Mitchell >> >> (1) Wait for readline-5.1 to be released, incorporate it into src/, and >> then to add the minimal termcap stuff to a file in gdb/ that is only >> used on MinGW. >> >> (2) I backport Chet's changes to rltty.c to the src/readline/ >> sourcebase, and then proceed as above. Because we know that these >> changes will be in readline-5.1, we needn't worry overmuch about >> divergence from upstread sources. >> >>You'll still need the minimal termcap stuff in gdb/ in this case isn't >>it? > > > Actually, I wonder if libiberty would be a better place for the minimal > termcap stuff. I knew someone would suggest that... OK, I'll try that approach. -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery, LLC mark@codesourcery.com (916) 791-8304