From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26788 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2005 15:48:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26746 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jun 2005 15:48:38 -0000 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 15:48:38 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5FFmbR0001834 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:48:37 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j5FFmbu09357; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:48:37 -0400 Received: from [172.16.14.151] (to-dhcp51.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.151]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j5FFmaeX005787; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:48:36 -0400 Message-ID: <42B03C1E.2090801@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 15:48:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-1 (X11/20050323) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Kettenis CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [commit] gdb_byte regcache.[hc] References: <428CC0B1.6020008@gnu.org> <20050519170724.GA24675@nevyn.them.org> <428CCBB8.4050603@gnu.org> <200506102212.j5AMCOoq028820@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <200506112128.j5BLSqmQ027273@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <200506112128.j5BLSqmQ027273@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00194.txt.bz2 > > Argh, let's blame it on my jetlag, but I meant regcache_raw_supply and > regcache_raw_collect as the function that should take `void *' instead > of `gdb_byte *'. The other regcache_raw_xxx functions can stay as > they are now. 6hrs time difference is not jetlag ... Just supply/collect is making more sense :-)