From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-39870-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 22989 invoked by alias); 11 Jun 2005 01:40:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 22978 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jun 2005 01:40:35 -0000
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 01:40:35 +0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5B1eYTE015108
	for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 21:40:34 -0400
Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j5B1eSO07256;
	Fri, 10 Jun 2005 21:40:28 -0400
Received: from [172.16.24.50] (bluegiant.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50])
	by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j5B1eQml001837;
	Fri, 10 Jun 2005 21:40:27 -0400
Message-ID: <42AA410A.7070008@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 01:40:00 -0000
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird  (X11/20050322)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
CC: kevinb@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Add support for Morpho ms1 processor
References: <20050603172038.449a41b9@ironwood.lan> <200506102312.j5ANCoWe018703@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
In-Reply-To: <200506102312.j5ANCoWe018703@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00103.txt.bz2

Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Especially naming an enum `gdb_regnum' seems like
> a bad idea to me.  What's the E_-prefix trying to convey?  I seem to
> remember a few other embedded processors using the same E_-prefix for
> their register names.  

Yeah, those were probably all mine.  I started doing that
a few years ago.  The prefix was just to differentiate the
enum from the macro -- avoid namespace pollution, you might
say.