From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3736 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2005 20:29:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3713 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Jun 2005 20:29:02 -0000 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:29:02 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5AKT17A013760 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:29:01 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j5AKSvO12215; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:28:58 -0400 Received: from [172.16.24.50] (bluegiant.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j5AKSeZF000789; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:28:42 -0400 Message-ID: <42A9F7F6.5050602@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:29:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird (X11/20050322) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii CC: Jason Molenda , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, kettenis@jive.nl Subject: Re: The gdb x86 function prologue parser References: <85C775AE-3B05-431E-96D2-49EA9D1413E6@apple.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00097.txt.bz2 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Last, but not least, I'd surely appreciate some write-up, even in > plain ASCII, about how prologue analyzers in general and the x86 one > in particular work: that stuff is sorely needed in gdbint.texinfo. Prologue parsing is a black art, on its way to becoming a lost art thanks to our increasing dependance on dwarf cfi. It would be great if Jason could preserve some of what he's having to relearn/reinvent -- but it wouldn't be fair of us to require this of him. This isn't new stuff, it's old stuff. Not to discourage you, Jason -- your name will be revered if you write this up, especially in the not-completely-unlikely event that someone else has to do this again someday.