From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7988 invoked by alias); 3 Jun 2005 19:36:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7974 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jun 2005 19:36:32 -0000 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 19:36:32 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j53JaUjl029223 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 15:36:30 -0400 Received: from pobox.toronto.redhat.com (pobox.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.4]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j53JaPO32304; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 15:36:25 -0400 Received: from touchme.toronto.redhat.com (IDENT:postfix@touchme.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.9]) by pobox.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j53JaPMX008101; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 15:36:25 -0400 Received: from [172.16.14.72] (toocool.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.72]) by touchme.toronto.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9B99800104; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 15:36:24 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42A0B138.10300@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 19:36:00 -0000 From: Jeff Johnston User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040805 Netscape/7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA]: Upstream bfd patch for ia64 vDSO support References: <429E16E9.8010301@redhat.com> <20050603190957.GC32722@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20050603190957.GC32722@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00031.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 04:13:29PM -0400, Jeff Johnston wrote: > >>The attached patch has been checked in to binutils by Jim Wilson. It fixes >>a problem with the ia64 vDSO so that gdb can backtrace from system calls. >>I need this to check in an ia64/libunwind patch that fixes backtracing >>through syscalls. I didn't know if one could just check in upstream bfd >>patches without approval so I will ask. May I commit this? > > > GDB and binutils live in the same source repository. Applying it to > one applies it to the other, except for release branches of course. > There's nothing more to do. > Ok, thanks for the clarification. -- Jeff J.