From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-39117-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 3386 invoked by alias); 1 May 2005 20:19:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 3378 invoked from network); 1 May 2005 20:19:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 1 May 2005 20:19:02 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j41KJ1FB009726
	for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Sun, 1 May 2005 16:19:02 -0400
Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j41KJ1O07336;
	Sun, 1 May 2005 16:19:01 -0400
Received: from [172.16.50.13] (vpn50-13.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.13])
	by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j41KIx1K006247;
	Sun, 1 May 2005 16:18:59 -0400
Message-ID: <42753958.70109@gnu.org>
Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 20:19:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-1 (X11/20050323)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
CC: mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [commit] Use bfd_byte in value.h
References: <42710E90.3030300@gnu.org> <200504281919.j3SJJKF1011501@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <42715EE8.5070704@gnu.org> <01c54c8a$Blat.v2.4$ffbe8140@zahav.net.il>
In-Reply-To: <01c54c8a$Blat.v2.4$ffbe8140@zahav.net.il>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00020.txt.bz2

Eli,

Last time this came up I recommeded separating out the idea of gdb_byte 
and proposed more formally.  How is this going?

In the mean time though (then and now) I'll use bfd_byte as that lets me 
move this code forward addressing the more immediate problem of not even 
compiling with -Werror on GCC 4.  With that done, i'm pretty sure that 
we'll find the follow-on task of s/bfd_byte/gdb_byte/ trivial.