Chet Ramey wrote:
>>Eli, just to be clear, you said you "support" the patches I posted (with
>>this exception).  I'm interpreting that as "I hope they go into upstream
>>readline", rather than as "it's OK to check these patches into the GDB
>>repository."  If you actually meant the latter, let me know. :-)
> 
> 
> I only looked at the changes briefly, but they looked fine.  I would
> not, in any case, replace `kill' with `raise' without an autoconf test.
> 
> Unless there's something fatally wrong with the patch, I don't have a
> problem incorporating it into the readline distribution.

Here's a revised version that does not use raise, unless kill is 
unavailable.

Please let me know if there's anything else I need to do.

Thanks,

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304