From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 99943 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2016 15:08:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 99932 invoked by uid 89); 28 Oct 2016 15:08:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:08:28 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE33E4F5; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:08:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u9SF8Q47029209; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 11:08:27 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] gdb: Require a C++11 compiler To: Yao Qi References: <1477596094-3244-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <426db43e-25e2-8eb6-71f3-30e00e28b64e@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:08:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-10/txt/msg00813.txt.bz2 On 10/28/2016 01:07 PM, Yao Qi wrote: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: >> As previously discussed, this patch set makes GDB require a C++11 >> compiler. >> >> You'll find the previous discussions referenced here: >> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2016-10/msg00607.html >> >> This is basically the same as I had sent here: >> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2016-10/msg00336.html >> >> The only difference is a single-line change that makes C++11 a >> mandatory instead of enabling it iff supported. >> > > This series is good to me. Thanks! I've pushed it in now. I'll send a NEWS change soon. Thanks, Pedro Alves