From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18903 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2005 22:09:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18641 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2005 22:09:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.9) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 25 Apr 2005 22:09:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 14204 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2005 22:09:01 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (mitchell@127.0.0.1) by mail.codesourcery.com with SMTP; 25 Apr 2005 22:09:01 -0000 Message-ID: <426D6A6E.1020505@codesourcery.com> Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 22:09:00 -0000 From: Mark Mitchell Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Kettenis CC: eliz@gnu.org, drow@false.org, me@cgf.cx, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PATCH: Support Windows in event-loop.c References: <20050424221806.GA13942@nevyn.them.org> <426C3270.4050608@codesourcery.com> <20050425042414.GA7322@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20050425131611.GA7821@nevyn.them.org> <20050425145023.GD6543@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <426D05D6.8010903@codesourcery.com> <20050425150422.GA13753@nevyn.them.org> <426D0A11.4060604@codesourcery.com> <20050425152324.GA15521@nevyn.them.org> <426D0C1D.8040600@codesourcery.com> <20050425153549.GA15967@nevyn.them.org> <426D5178.6010502@codesourcery.com> <01c549da$Blat.v2.4$626aed00@zahav.net.il> <426D6518.9050305@codesourcery.com> <200504252158.j3PLwK6B031670@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <200504252158.j3PLwK6B031670@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00327.txt.bz2 Mark Kettenis wrote: > Thanks, committed. > > Thanks! That was the last patch, isn't it? If so, can you add some > blurp to NEWS about it? Not *quite* the last patch. There are still readline changes required. By and large, I should think these will be rather less controversial; most of them are just using autoconf macros to avoid using stuff that Windows doesn't have. There is also one patch that basically says "don't use any of that termcap stuff" -- but that's really just a Makefile patch not to link in one file under Windows. I understand that the readline used by GDB contains some GDB-local patches. So, I'm planning to submit my patches to this list, too. I know that normally we'd want to go to the upstream source, but Daniel says that's probably not practical in this case. So, is it OK to submit readline patches here? -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery, LLC mark@codesourcery.com (916) 791-8304