From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2965 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2005 19:17:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2852 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2005 19:17:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out3.apple.com) (17.254.13.22) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 12 Apr 2005 19:17:39 -0000 Received: from mailgate2.apple.com (a17-128-100-204.apple.com [17.128.100.204]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j3CJHcwK023612 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 12:17:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay3.apple.com (relay3.apple.com) by mailgate2.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.17) with ESMTP id ; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 12:17:38 -0700 Received: from [17.219.199.207] ([17.219.199.207]) by relay3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j3CJHbPQ005573; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 12:17:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <425C1ECE.9060907@apple.com> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 19:17:00 -0000 From: Stan Shebs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii CC: "Maciej W. Rozycki" , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Support for "break *ADDRESS thread THREADNO" References: <20050412181334.GA2560@nevyn.them.org> <01c53f90$Blat.v2.4$17427900@zahav.net.il> <20050412185549.GA9715@nevyn.them.org> <01c53f92$Blat.v2.4$280330c0@zahav.net.il> In-Reply-To: <01c53f92$Blat.v2.4$280330c0@zahav.net.il> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00103.txt.bz2 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >Or maybe a command option "break --thread=ID *ADDR". (Or did we >decide to not use such syntax?) > "--" is still valid expression syntax, though unlikely in that context. Looking at the keyboard, I don't see much that is not already part of language or GDB syntax. How about '/', which has no unary usage, and is already used for command modifiers? Stan