From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2988 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2016 23:21:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 2976 invoked by uid 89); 9 Dec 2016 23:21:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_RED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*f:sk:6a0a1a3, sk:testsui X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 23:21:01 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-mbx-03.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.90.203]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1cFUTM-0000mU-0v from Luis_Gustavo@mentor.com ; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 15:21:00 -0800 Received: from [172.30.6.208] (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-mbx-03.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.90.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 15:20:57 -0800 Reply-To: Luis Machado Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix more cases of improper test names References: <6a0a1a3f-91ef-a0d5-c52f-7b8ae86008ef@codesourcery.com> To: Pedro Alves CC: Markus T Metzger , GDB Patches From: Luis Machado Message-ID: <425375a2-c3e0-50a5-8a55-33bed3a6cca4@codesourcery.com> Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 23:21:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-orw-mbx-02.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.90.202) To svr-orw-mbx-03.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.90.203) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg00257.txt.bz2 On 12/09/2016 04:10 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: > Em 09/12/2016 21:58, "Luis Machado" > escreveu: >> >> I noticed more occurrences of improper test names. The rather > mechanical, tedious and large patch below addresses, hopefully, most of > the leftover cases. >> >> As usual, another pair of eyes is welcome to check if i missed > something or did an invalid substitution. I anticipate it is going to be > equally tedious to review this. :-) >> >> This patch also fixes the prepare_for_testing calls to pass proper > test names. >> >> Also, since it is quite a big patch, gdb-patches@... rejected the > message (more than 400K). Not ideal, but a tarball is attached. >> > > Can you push it as a user branch? > Yes. Just need to figure out the proper way to do it (i suppose it is documented somewhere). Are you proposing it simply for review purposes or to be used for further testsuite-related changes?