From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-38682-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 2841 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2005 18:21:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 2778 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2005 18:21:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 4 Apr 2005 18:21:31 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j34ILVgo013052
	for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:21:31 -0400
Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j34ILVO28483;
	Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:21:31 -0400
Received: from redhat.com (dhcp-172-16-25-137.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.25.137])
	by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j34ILTKi013411;
	Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:21:29 -0400
Message-ID: <425185A9.8090104@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 18:21:00 -0000
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.3) Gecko/20040924
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Demme <me@teqdruid.com>
CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: D Symbol Demangling
References: <1112582221.14153.32.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <1112582221.14153.32.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00044.txt.bz2

John Demme wrote:
> Thus far, I've had partial success.  In fairly simple D programs, my
> demangling works, but in more complex programs with mixed C and D code
> (D is link-compatible with C) it only calls the D demangler for some of
> the functions.

What's the granularity of mixed code?  Is it mixed within a source
file, or just between source files?  If a source file contains only
one language, I think gdb ought to be able to discern it reliably.

When you say "for some of the functions", what differentiates
the ones where it successfully discerns the D language from those
where it doesn't?