From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2113 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2005 16:51:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2034 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2005 16:51:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.9) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 Mar 2005 16:51:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 24636 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2005 16:51:48 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.4?) (mitchell@127.0.0.1) by mail.codesourcery.com with SMTP; 16 Mar 2005 16:51:48 -0000 Message-ID: <4238641D.70403@codesourcery.com> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:51:00 -0000 From: Mark Mitchell Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PATCH: Allow for systems that do not define SIGQUIT/SIGPIPE References: <200503161633.j2GGX3Fl020753@sethra.codesourcery.com> <20050316164309.GA5418@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20050316164309.GA5418@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00217.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 08:33:03AM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote: > >>Windows does not have SIGQUIT or SIGPIPE. >> >>Tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. >> >>OK? > > > You should probably #ifdef out handle_sigquit and its prototype also, > or GCC will warn about it. Right? See the example for SIGWINCH. Actually, GCC doesn't warn because handle_sigquit references itself. :-) I'll make that change; OK, assuming it builds? -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery, LLC mark@codesourcery.com (916) 791-8304