From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15925 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2005 16:37:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15850 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2005 16:37:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.9) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 Mar 2005 16:37:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 21722 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2005 16:37:51 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.4?) (mitchell@127.0.0.1) by mail.codesourcery.com with SMTP; 16 Mar 2005 16:37:51 -0000 Message-ID: <423860D8.2050605@codesourcery.com> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:37:00 -0000 From: Mark Mitchell Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PATCH: Guard uses of fork References: <200503100400.j2A4055p021369@sirius.codesourcery.com> <20050316152923.GA30681@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20050316152923.GA30681@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00214.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > This is OK. I'm not sure my understanding of the DJGPP bits is > correct, but this patch is safe whether I was right or wrong, which is > why I like it. Applied, thanks! -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery, LLC mark@codesourcery.com (916) 791-8304