From: Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>
To: Andreas Arnez <arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
<gdb-patches@sourceware.org>, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bitfield-parent-optimized-out: Fix struct definition
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 23:27:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42361b5d-89ad-553d-ca60-534af299d2ce@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3bmxlx0ya.fsf@oc1027705133.ibm.com>
On 11/11/2016 01:37 PM, Andreas Arnez wrote:
> The "struct S" type in bitfield-parent-optimized-out.exp is declared to
> have a size of 4 bytes but to hold two 4-byte members: an int-based
> bitfield and a 4-byte int. Also, both members have the same
> data_member_location 2, causing them to overlap and to reach 2 bytes
> beyond the structure's boundary.
>
> This is fixed by increasing the structure size to 8 and setting the
> first and second member's data_member_location to 0 and 4, respectively.
>
> gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gdb.dwarf2/bitfield-parent-optimized-out.exp: Fix DWARF code for
> the definition of struct S.
> ---
> gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/bitfield-parent-optimized-out.exp | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/bitfield-parent-optimized-out.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/bitfield-parent-optimized-out.exp
> index 27d8044..b789970 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/bitfield-parent-optimized-out.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/bitfield-parent-optimized-out.exp
> @@ -43,19 +43,18 @@ Dwarf::assemble $asm_file {
>
> struct_label: structure_type {
> {name S}
> - {byte_size 4 DW_FORM_sdata}
> + {byte_size 8 DW_FORM_sdata}
> } {
> member {
> {name bitfield}
> {type :$int_label}
> {bit_size 12 DW_FORM_sdata}
> {bit_offset 20 DW_FORM_sdata}
> - {data_member_location 2 DW_FORM_sdata}
> }
> member {
> {name intfield}
> {type :$int_label}
> - {data_member_location 2 DW_FORM_sdata}
> + {data_member_location 4 DW_FORM_sdata}
> }
> }
>
>
The patch looks good to me, but i'm wondering if Pedro meant for both
members to overlap (a union) instead of being two separate members?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-11 23:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-11 19:37 Andreas Arnez
2016-11-11 23:27 ` Luis Machado [this message]
2016-11-15 18:12 ` Pedro Alves
2016-11-15 19:53 ` Andreas Arnez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42361b5d-89ad-553d-ca60-534af299d2ce@codesourcery.com \
--to=lgustavo@codesourcery.com \
--cc=arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox