Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Two comments:
> 
> - Could you add a non-tracepoint testcase for this?  I think one good
> place would be gdb.cp/userdef.exp.
done. As this overloads operator+, I introduced a new class for
the breakpoint test.


>>!   if (TYPE_CODE (type) == TYPE_CODE_FLT)
>>!     return arg1;
> 
> 
> - IIUC, that's not quite right - we need an rvalue here.

Like this?

built and tested on i686-pc-linux-gnu, ok?

nathan

-- 
Nathan Sidwell    ::   http://www.codesourcery.com   ::     CodeSourcery LLC
nathan@codesourcery.com    ::     http://www.planetfall.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk