From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27193 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2005 13:46:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27126 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2005 13:46:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 Feb 2005 13:46:04 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j1GDk3gu004669 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 08:46:04 -0500 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (vpn50-74.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.74]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j1GDk2O32161; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 08:46:02 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB5B7D79; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 08:44:19 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <42134E33.1020004@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 17:35:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20041020) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yoshinori Sato Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] new frame code for h8300 target References: <41993EFE.3060409@gnu.org> <41E6E496.3000302@gnu.org> <4200FA23.3070602@gnu.org> <420A1BA9.6040209@gnu.org> <420A41D6.60205@gnu.org> <42115848.9000105@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00166.txt.bz2 Yoshinori Sato wrote: > At Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:02:48 -0500, > Andrew Cagney wrote: > >>[1 ] >>Just FYI, the changes to resurect h8300-tdep.c and h8300.mt are ok (I >>see the're already committed). However the change to resurect >>config/h8300/tm-h8300.h isn't - the h8300 is now considered to be a new >>architecture and any new architecture is required to be pure multi-arch >>(i.e., no tm-*.h file). >> >>Looking forward to patches that fix that. >> >>In the mean time I've committed the attached, >>Andrew > > > I made sure. > Because a section depending on tm-h8300.h seems to be left, > I will correct it. Thanks. Andrew