From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23598 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2005 13:04:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23527 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2005 13:04:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 Feb 2005 13:04:01 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j1GD3uNC025861 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 08:04:01 -0500 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (vpn50-74.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.74]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j1GD3uO10455; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 08:03:56 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 724C57D79; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 08:02:12 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <42134451.8090700@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:26:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20041020) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Use TRY_CATCH in wrapper.c References: <200502160108.j1G18pgi000277@copland.sibelius.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <200502160108.j1G18pgi000277@copland.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00164.txt.bz2 Mark Kettenis wrote: > Andrew, > > Am I right in assuming that TRY_CATCH was added to make things like > this possible? It sure cleans things up up ;-). Yes, exactly. These cleanups, assuming before/after test results are identical, should be treated as obvious. Andrew