From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-38033-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 20526 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2005 15:40:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 20303 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2005 15:40:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 10 Feb 2005 15:40:11 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j1AFeBKw008742
	for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:40:11 -0500
Received: from localhost.redhat.com (to-dhcp51.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.151])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j1AFe5O30722;
	Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:40:05 -0500
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E05C87D79;
	Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:39:21 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <420B8026.2060006@gnu.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:43:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20041020)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: MI testsuite improvements
References: <20050210135229.GB28065@white>
In-Reply-To: <20050210135229.GB28065@white>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00090.txt.bz2

Bob Rossi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This patch is a prerequisite to the patch that includes the syntax
> checker for the MI output commands.

> It does several things,

Please, one change, one patch.

>    - Gives the inferior it's own PTY to send output to

I'm ok with this, as I think you noted elsewhere, this has become the 
defacto standard.  Would you be interested in documenting this?

The change should be applied to just mi-* and not mi2-*, and should only 
accept plain text on that PTY.   @... output on the PTY should be 
rejected ("in theory" so should anything on GDB's pty).

Once you've committed this, we can look at the next problem.

Andrew