From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31165 invoked by alias); 9 Feb 2005 18:49:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31141 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2005 18:49:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 9 Feb 2005 18:49:41 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j19InedO013099 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 13:49:41 -0500 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (vpn50-64.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.64]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j19IneO08501; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 13:49:40 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EED67D79; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 13:49:00 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <420A5B19.40702@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 19:13:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20041020) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/testsuite/ada] New testcase for "start" command w/ Ada programs References: <20050209183726.GG18546@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20050209183726.GG18546@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00068.txt.bz2 Joel Brobecker wrote: > Hello, > > Andrew suggested (privately) that a "start" testcase would be nice. > So here it is. > > 2005-02-09 Joel Brobecker > > * gdb.ada/start/dummy.adb: New file. > * gdb.ada/start.exp: New testcase. > > Tested on x86-linux. The test currently fails, because I have a patch > almost approved but not quite, see > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-11/msg00501.html > > It should pass as soon as the patch mentioned above is approved. Thanks, yes! Is a non-ada specific equivalent also possible (if it is already approved)? Andrew