From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32514 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2005 18:48:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32442 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2005 18:48:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 28 Jan 2005 18:48:31 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j0SImQYr020398 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 13:48:31 -0500 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (vpn50-67.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.67]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j0SImPO27651; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 13:48:25 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B77A7D79; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 13:48:16 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <41FA88EE.2030109@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:48:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20041020) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Mark Kettenis Subject: Re: [commit] Tighten memory read/write methods References: <41F94AE7.4020405@gnu.org> <200501272103.j0RL3TWS001805@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <41F973EA.6030305@gnu.org> <200501280845.j0S8jkZx000823@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <01c5052e$Blat.v2.4$2b4f9f00@zahav.net.il> In-Reply-To: <01c5052e$Blat.v2.4$2b4f9f00@zahav.net.il> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg00279.txt.bz2 Eli, Like I said to Mark: > We can certainly debate the merits of ISO vs BFD and bfd_byte vs void [vs gdb_byte], however lets keep that debate separate to my current task - getting constants sufficiently propogated for me to do my next value.h commit which in turn finishes DW_OP_piece. Andrew