Re: [rfa] Add some flags to tramp frame unwinder

[Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>]

Randolph Chung wrote:
> I'd like to use the generic tramp frame code for pa targets;
> unfortunately hpux decided that the signal trampoline function should
> have a regular function name, so we cannot use the generic 
> infrastructure (it considers code which is inside a function to be not a
> trampoline).
> 
> I added some flags to the tramp_frame structure to make those checks
> optional. Really, I only need the "ok_inside_function" flag, but for
> completeness I added "ok_inside_section" as well.

Instead of this, delete the test and in its place add a comment 
explaining what was there.  I just hit another similar case - signal 
trampolines on altstacks - where there's either/or a valid symbol or 
segment.

Andrew