From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5427 invoked by alias); 30 Nov 2004 16:59:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4987 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2004 16:59:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 30 Nov 2004 16:59:47 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iAUGxgAV009569 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:59:42 -0500 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (vpn50-77.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.77]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iAUGxar06686; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:59:36 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AAD0129D8C; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:58:41 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <41ACA6BE.5080603@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 16:59:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20041020) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Randolph Chung Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/RFA] multiarch INSTRUCTION_NULLIFIED References: <20041118162108.GK15714@tausq.org> <200411181655.iAIGthDa026050@juw15.nfra.nl> <20041123174937.GL9148@tausq.org> <41AA09F8.4020006@gnu.org> <20041128184141.GG6359@tausq.org> <41AA2D08.3030304@gnu.org> <20041129033013.GJ6359@tausq.org> <41AB3C1D.80509@gnu.org> <20041130065620.GT6359@tausq.org> <41AC88B2.5070501@gnu.org> <20041130164401.GV6359@tausq.org> In-Reply-To: <20041130164401.GV6359@tausq.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00536.txt.bz2 Randolph Chung wrote: > well, first i want to understand the problem. because i'm still not > yet 100% convinced that step_through_delay will work. simply using the > "instruction_nullified" method in hppa-tdep as the "step_through_delay" > method certainly is not working... When doing a stepi? step_through_delay certainly won't help when it comes to doing a backtrace from the nullified instruction. Andrew