From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2543 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2004 14:10:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2152 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2004 14:09:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 18 Nov 2004 14:09:53 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iAIE9qku007098 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 09:09:53 -0500 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (to-dhcp51.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.151]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iAIE9qr32312; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 09:09:52 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54A78129D8C; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 09:09:45 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <419CAD27.5080908@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 14:10:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20041020) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Kettenis Cc: eliz@gnu.org, joseph@codesourcery.com, kevinb@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Assume solib.h References: <4193BFA0.3060607@gnu.org> <200411112005.iABK5FrV098628@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <4193DDCE.7060205@gnu.org> <200411112224.iABMODmo099121@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <4194DBEB.6010304@gnu.org> <01c4c8db$Blat.v2.2.2$377f5020@zahav.net.il> <419942CB.4000905@gnu.org> <01c4cb98$Blat.v2.2.2$fc133040@zahav.net.il> <419A2742.8070804@gnu.org> <200411161917.iAGJHqO8000702@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <200411161917.iAGJHqO8000702@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00372.txt.bz2 > Yup, I'm wrong. Not *every* embedded target will break. Some of them > include solib-svr4.o or some other solib-xxx.o; powerpc-elf is one of > them. I'm also wrong that it breaks vax-dec-openbsd* for pretty much > the same reason. However, there are plenty of embedded targets for > which I'm pretty certain that my analysis is true: arm-elf, mips-elf, > i386-elf are among them. I'm not. Can you test my, or kevin's patch? The're pretty much equivalent. Andrew