Jeff Johnston wrote:
> Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
>> Jeff Johnston wrote:
>>
>>> The following is a test for the change I recently made to allow 
>>> macros to continue operating even after a backtrace failure occurs.
>>>
>>> Tested on x86-linux with linuxthreads and ia64-linux with nptl threads.
>>
>>
>>
>> Can you think of an alternative to "macro" as the prefix?  "macro" can 
>> also refer to:
>>
>>     #define MACRO
>>
>> (If I new of one, I'd suggest it :-)  With a better name, ok.
>>
> 
> Will rename to threadapply.exp and threadapply.c
> 
> -- Jeff J.
>

The following has been checked in.  Tested on old x86-linux with linuxthreads 
and RHEL3 x86-linux.

-- Jeff J.

2004-11-11  Jeff Johnston  <jjohnstn@redhat.com>

         * gdb.threads/threadapply.exp: New test.
         * gdb.threads/threadapply.c: New file.