From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17053 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2004 16:40:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17036 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2004 16:40:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 8 Nov 2004 16:40:46 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iA8Geji9000678 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 11:40:45 -0500 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (to-dhcp51.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.151]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iA8Gegr26708; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 11:40:42 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87726129D8C; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 11:39:54 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <418FA158.6060501@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 16:40:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20041020) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, ezannoni@redhat.com, roland@redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa] Attach vsyscall support for GNU/Linux References: <20041024185345.GB22700@nevyn.them.org> <200410242054.i9OKsjnl028328@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20041024231636.GA21927@nevyn.them.org> <200410252212.i9PMCQhJ031724@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20041101161552.GA26993@nevyn.them.org> <200411012045.iA1KjKDg000415@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20041101223246.GA28889@nevyn.them.org> <4187998B.1040700@gnu.org> <20041107213539.GB8812@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20041107213539.GB8812@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00130.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 09:28:27AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >>Can you translate the above into code? At present it's i386 so what >>would I care? > > > I've checked in this patch after testing on i386-pc-linux-gnu. > Vsyscall support now works on HEAD. > > It's been a while since you wrote this, and we're much closer to the > planned release of 6.3. I can move both patches to the branch or hold > them for 6.3.1/6.4; let me know what you'd prefer. Hold them for 6.3.1 (in a few weeks), we're not so much closer as on top of 6.3. Andrew