From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23449 invoked by alias); 2 Nov 2004 14:29:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23219 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2004 14:29:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 2 Nov 2004 14:29:02 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iA2ET1I0028665 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2004 09:29:01 -0500 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (to-dhcp51.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.151]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iA2ET0r05212; Tue, 2 Nov 2004 09:29:00 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 905BF129D8C; Tue, 2 Nov 2004 09:28:27 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4187998B.1040700@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 14:29:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20041020) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, ezannoni@redhat.com, roland@redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa] Attach vsyscall support for GNU/Linux References: <20041024185345.GB22700@nevyn.them.org> <200410242054.i9OKsjnl028328@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20041024231636.GA21927@nevyn.them.org> <200410252212.i9PMCQhJ031724@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20041101161552.GA26993@nevyn.them.org> <200411012045.iA1KjKDg000415@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20041101223246.GA28889@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20041101223246.GA28889@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00036.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 09:45:20PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > >> I think this patch is very important for 6.3. >> >>...you might want to convince Andrew to include your origional patch >>in 6.3. Or better yet, a patch that prepends a signal frame unwinder >>only for Linux. If you succeed, you have my blessing to check this in >>on mainline too, provided you add a big fat warning why this is done >>and that it's so wrong. > > > In that case, I'll just wait while you come to an agreement. I've been > applying vsyscall patches to the Debian GDB package since 6.1; I can do > it for another release. Can you translate the above into code? At present it's i386 so what would I care? Andrew