From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15692 invoked by alias); 30 Oct 2004 21:59:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15680 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2004 21:59:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.42.65.225) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 30 Oct 2004 21:59:44 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E7C9129D8C; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 16:59:33 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <418400B0.50006@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 21:59:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20041020) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Kettenis , "Joseph S. Myers" Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [COMMIT] Prepare Solaris x86 for 64-bit Solaris 10 References: <200410301950.i9UJorQL009142@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <4183F11A.6090802@gnu.org> <200410302113.i9ULDPPR009389@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <200410302113.i9ULDPPR009389@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00517.txt.bz2 Mark Kettenis wrote: > Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 15:52:58 -0400 > From: Andrew Cagney > > Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Including a .c file is perhaps a bit unorthodox, but this really is > > the most elegant way I can think of to solve the issue with the > > upcoming 64-bit Solaris 10. > > Why not have 368-sol2-nat inherit i386v4-nat's target vector? > > There's nothing there to inherit :-(. I'm still thinking about the > proper way to regset-ize fill_gregset(), fill_fpregset(), > supply_gregset() and supply_fpregset() in relation to the SVR4-like > /proc filesystem. > > Oh, and I'm slowly beating the /proc support into shape such that I > can it can be inherited. Will take some time though before this > becomes reality. Sounds like something Joseph could help with. He's the one with the immediate desire to get sol10/amd64 supported. What we're not going to add is screwed up #include inheritance, can you revert that? Andrew