From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29424 invoked by alias); 19 Oct 2004 19:37:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29402 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2004 19:37:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO granger.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.148) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 19 Oct 2004 19:37:19 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by granger.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1CJznK-0001Qm-00; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:37:18 -0400 Received: from mindspring.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E95F84B102; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:37:41 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 19:37:00 -0000 From: Michael Chastain To: eliz@gnu.org Subject: Re: [rfc/NEWS] GDB works with GCC -feliminate-dwarf2-dups. Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, dan@debian.org Message-ID: <41756D05.nailOLN11PH2H@mindspring.com> References: <4172B5F4.nailMEV1154GO@mindspring.com> <20041017183143.GA22628@nevyn.them.org> <4172BF74.nailMK41WRWF5@mindspring.com> <20041017191337.GA23601@nevyn.them.org> <4172D1FF.nailMO5211TI7@mindspring.com> <01c4b4cf$Blat.v2.2.2$1a0e6f00@zahav.net.il> <417423FA.nailP2L12S6AW@mindspring.com> <01c4b595$Blat.v2.2.2$2312b680@zahav.net.il> In-Reply-To: <01c4b595$Blat.v2.2.2$2312b680@zahav.net.il> User-Agent: nail 10.8 6/28/04 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00321.txt.bz2 "Eli Zaretskii" wrote: > IMHO, these considerations don't matter when a NEWS entry is being > considered. What matters then is that something which didn't work > before works now. Well, this is the sort of philosophical fine point that works better face-to-face with some beer rather than e-mail. > However, at the very least replace "commercial" with > "proprietary". This is a distinction the FSF asks us to make (there's > nothing to prevent a free software project from going commercial as > long at is stays GPL-compliant). Sure, I'll be happy to do that. Michael