From: Michael Chastain <mec.gnu@mindspring.com>
To: dan@debian.org, eliz@gnu.org
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfc/NEWS] GDB works with GCC -feliminate-dwarf2-dups.
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 20:14:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <417423FA.nailP2L12S6AW@mindspring.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01c4b4cf$Blat.v2.2.2$1a0e6f00@zahav.net.il>
"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> I don't understand what you are saying ...
It's like this. When gdb and gcc don't work together, I have to decide
whether I think it's a bug in gdb (so I file a gdb PR) or a bug in gcc
(so I file a gcc PR). Some contemplation of this relationship leads
me to say: gdb and gcc are truly separate entities. It's not that
"gdb X works with gcc Y", it's more exactly "gdb X and gcc Y both
support standards Z1, Z2, and Z3".
This is especially true because gdb works with other compilers besides gcc,
and as far as I know, gcc works with other debuggers besides gdb.
It's a subtle point, and even after you see it, you might not agree
with it.
eli> GDB can now debug programs compiled with the -feliminate-dwarf2-dups
eli> option to GCC 3.3.4 or later, as well as programs compiled with
eli> proprietary compilers that produce similar debug information (a more
eli> compact representation of DWARF-2 debug information using the
eli> DW_FORM_ref_addr references).
Well, after fooling with this a little bit, I like my version better.
I'm comfortable claiming that GDB supports DW_FORM_ref_addr, so that if
a compiler produces this information, GDB can support it. I'm not
comfortable claiming that GDB can support "programs compiled with
proprietary compilers that produce similar debug information".
But you're the doco guy, so if you like it that way, go for it.
Michael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-18 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-17 18:12 Michael Chastain
2004-10-17 18:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-10-17 18:53 ` Michael Chastain
2004-10-17 19:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-10-17 20:11 ` Michael Chastain
2004-10-18 5:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-10-18 20:14 ` Michael Chastain [this message]
2004-10-19 4:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-10-19 13:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-10-19 20:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-10-19 19:37 ` Michael Chastain
2004-10-17 19:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-10-17 19:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=417423FA.nailP2L12S6AW@mindspring.com \
--to=mec.gnu@mindspring.com \
--cc=dan@debian.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox