From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19624 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2004 18:55:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19602 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2004 18:55:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mclean.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.57) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 14 Oct 2004 18:55:29 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by mclean.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1CIAkt-0001k7-00; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 14:55:15 -0400 Received: from mindspring.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 55D174B102; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 14:55:16 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 18:55:00 -0000 From: Michael Chastain To: zack@codesourcery.com Subject: Re: testsuite fixes for bleeding edge gcc Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: <416ECB94.nail14E11I0TO@mindspring.com> References: <87brf5n3c4.fsf@codesourcery.com> <416E6B8F.nail1FK2IQHOI@mindspring.com> <87y8i9kzh0.fsf@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <87y8i9kzh0.fsf@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: nail 10.8 6/28/04 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00251.txt.bz2 > whether my GCC changes worked. Ah. That is a good reason for me to keep up maintenance on the 6.2 branch, if it happens often enough. Just because we don't release from the branch doesn't mean it's useless. Also if you are doing before-and-after comparisons with gdb, watch out for some tests that are unstable from run to run. http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-testers ... and search for particular test names. Or just google the test names. > Would be nice to get gdb.mi/gdb701 fixed in HEAD though. Yeah. Andrew or I have to pick up that little nit. Michael