From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6559 invoked by alias); 4 Oct 2004 14:31:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6551 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2004 14:31:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 4 Oct 2004 14:31:33 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i94EVNcN016352 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 10:31:28 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i94EVHr15605; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 10:31:17 -0400 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C47528D2; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 10:31:01 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <41615EA5.8050803@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 14:31:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040831 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Build inf-ptrace.o when ptrace available References: <415DC09D.2070407@gnu.org> <20041003145013.GA14842@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20041003145013.GA14842@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2 > On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 04:39:57PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >>> Hello, >>> >>> This modifies GDB's configure to build inf-ptrace.o whenever the ptrace >>> call is available. Thoughts? > > > I think this only makes sense as part of the removal of NATDEPFILES, > and that it doesn't make sense without the context of how you plan to > remove the other members of NATDEPFILES. Since we're still going to > need a way to specify the native configuration files, why bother? See Mark's e-mail (and it is easier than remembering which NATDEPFILES need it). Andrew