From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16003 invoked by alias); 24 Sep 2004 15:12:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15995 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2004 15:12:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 24 Sep 2004 15:12:54 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8OFCr3h028737 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:12:54 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i8OFCrr03375; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:12:53 -0400 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E5C928D2; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:10:37 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <415438EC.5020702@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:12:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040831 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/PATCH/mips16] Remove dead code in mips_insn16_frame_cache References: <20040923233443.GJ968@gnat.com> <41542C42.1060500@gnu.org> <20040924143525.GP968@gnat.com> In-Reply-To: <20040924143525.GP968@gnat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00404.txt.bz2 >>>2004-09-23 Joel Brobecker >>>> > >>>> > * mips-tdep.c (mips_insn16_frame_cache): Remove dead code or >>>> > conditions that will always be true. >> >>> >>> Definitly! > > > Thanks! I will commit this change later today. May I have permission > to mimic the mips32 changes into mips16 without asking for approval? > Or would you rather see the patch first? (I'm asking because it saves > me a tiny bit of time. But not much so it's not a big deal if I have > to send an RFA first). yep, Andrew