From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2275 invoked by alias); 22 Sep 2004 13:38:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2267 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2004 13:38:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 22 Sep 2004 13:38:48 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8MDclif006204 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:38:47 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i8MDclr26465; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:38:47 -0400 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB23F28D2; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:36:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <41517FD5.3080104@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:38:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040831 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch;rfa:doc] 5.2.50 on mainline References: <41508EC1.9040506@gnu.org> <20040922005813.GG968@gnat.com> In-Reply-To: <20040922005813.GG968@gnat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00352.txt.bz2 > Just a small comment: > > >>> ! >>> ! | >>> ! 5.1.50_2002-03-03-cvs >>> ! | >>> ! +--------------------------. >>> ! >>> ! | | >>> ! 5.1.90 (draft #1) 5.2.50_2002-03-03-cvs >>> ! | | >>> ! 5.1.90_2002-03-03-cvs 5.2.50_2002-03-04-cvs >>> ! | | >>> ! 5.1.91 (draft #2) 5.2.50_2002-03-05-cvs >>> ! | | >>> ! 5.1.91_2002-03-05-cvs 5.2.50_2002-03-06-cvs >>> ! | | >>> ! 5.2 (release) 5.2.50_2002-03-06-cvs >>> ! | | >>> ! 5.2.0.90_2002-03-07-cvs 5.2.50_2002-03-07-cvs >>> ! | | >>> ! 5.2.1 (update) 5.2.50_2002-03-08-cvs >>> ! | >>> ! +----------- - - >>> ! >>> ! | >>> ! 5.2.90 (draft #1) > > > It seems more natural to me to have mainline be a straight line > and then have each branch be cut out of mainline. Something like > this: The intent is to make the release heritage clear, hence 5.1.50, 5.1.90, 5.1.91, 5.2, 5.2.1 are all in a straight line. That clarity is what the i18n group were asking for (but perhaphs not diagramatically :-). Either way, I'll: - strip out some of the mainline dates (no value add) - add an marker to the branch - change to et.al. Andrew > > | > 5.1.50_2002-03-03-cvs > | > +--------------------------. > | > | | > 5.2.50_2002-03-03-cvs 5.1.90 (draft #1) > | | > 5.2.50_2002-03-04-cvs 5.1.90_2002-03-03-cvs > | | > 5.2.50_2002-03-05-cvs 5.1.91 (draft #2) > | | > 5.2.50_2002-03-06-cvs 5.1.91_2002-03-05-cvs > | | > 5.2.50_2002-03-06-cvs 5.2 (release) > | | > 5.2.50_2002-03-07-cvs 5.2.0.90_2002-03-07-cvs > | | > 5.2.50_2002-03-08-cvs 5.2.1 (update) > | > 5.2.50_2002-03-09-cvs > | > 5.2.50_2002-03-10-cvs > | > 5.2.50_2002-03-11-cvs > | > 5.2.50_2002-03-12-cvs > | > +--------------------------. > | > | | > 5.3.50_2002-03-13-cvs 5.2.90 (draft #1) > | | > > > -- Joel