From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12950 invoked by alias); 15 Sep 2004 17:59:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12943 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2004 17:59:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 15 Sep 2004 17:59:15 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8FHxFGM004808 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 13:59:15 -0400 Received: from pobox.toronto.redhat.com (pobox.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.4]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i8FHxFr08815; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 13:59:15 -0400 Received: from touchme.toronto.redhat.com (IDENT:postfix@touchme.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.9]) by pobox.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i8FHxF1l023588; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 13:59:15 -0400 Received: from redhat.com (toocool.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.72]) by touchme.toronto.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB50F80026B; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 13:59:14 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <414882F2.5000502@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 17:59:00 -0000 From: Jeff Johnston User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC]: Ugly thread step situation References: <20040914232505.GA16818@nevyn.them.org> <41487D8D.7060800@redhat.com> <4148811B.3080306@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <4148811B.3080306@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00259.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney wrote: >> Attached. This was the test-case given for Red Hat Bugzilla bug 130896. > > > The FSF can't accept this, or integrate it into the testsuite/ > > Andrew > Yes, I should have stated that. It is just to allow Daniel (and others) to recreate the problem. -- Jeff J. > >