From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23009 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2004 16:28:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22985 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2004 16:28:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mclean.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.57) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 10 Sep 2004 16:28:27 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by mclean.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1C5oG8-0005rb-00; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:28:24 -0400 Received: from mindspring.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B860D4B102; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:28:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 16:28:00 -0000 From: Michael Chastain To: eliz@gnu.org Subject: Re: [rfc/testsuite/doco] deprecate.txt Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: <4141D63F.nailJAS11HW9M@mindspring.com> References: <4141B12A.nail2461S2ZKE@mindspring.com> <01c49751$Blat.v2.2.2$85ca7680@zahav.net.il> In-Reply-To: <01c49751$Blat.v2.2.2$85ca7680@zahav.net.il> User-Agent: nail 10.8 6/28/04 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00167.txt.bz2 > I won't fight you if you feel strongly about that, but let me ask: > why do you think it is better to keep this file separate? My > experience tells me that having several separate files is worse than > having a single file. It's likely to grow and change rapidly for a couple of weeks, so I want to keep it separate during that stage at least. But it is doco, so you get to tell me how to organize it. Michael