From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13120 invoked by alias); 9 Sep 2004 17:35:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13111 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2004 17:35:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 9 Sep 2004 17:35:13 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i89HZCS0025977 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 13:35:12 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i89HZA711542; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 13:35:10 -0400 Received: from redhat.com (dhcp-172-16-25-160.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.25.160]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i89HZ9V22044; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 10:35:09 -0700 Message-ID: <4140944D.9060608@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 17:35:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; es-ES; rv:1.4.2) Gecko/20040301 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: "M.M. Kettenis" , Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, kettenis@gnu.org Subject: Re: [rfa] Delete keep_thread_db References: <7318322520085180@weblx058.utsp.utwente.nl> <20040908143802.GA23406@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20040908143802.GA23406@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00148.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 07:00:00AM +0000, M.M. Kettenis wrote: > >>Anyway, I don't care about this code anymore. I've given up on >>debugging-with threads on Linux. thread-db.c should renamed into >>linux-thread.c or somesuch. It, and lin-lwp.c have become a mess of >>workarounds around workarounds around workarounds that probably only >>work if you run a specific combination of glibc and patched kernel. > > > I do care about this code. It needs some major surgery, but it is > still useful (and, while fragile, not quite as fragile as all that). If > no one else is interested in maintaining it then I would like to. > I'm still interested. Let's share it?