From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14875 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2004 19:20:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14868 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2004 19:20:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 1 Sep 2004 19:20:36 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i81JKVS2003147 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 15:20:36 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i81JKP332710; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 15:20:25 -0400 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00EBA28D2; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 15:19:13 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <413620B1.3060500@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 19:20:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040831 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] inline find_proc_desc into mips_insn32_frame_cache References: <20040901184716.GB978@gnat.com> In-Reply-To: <20040901184716.GB978@gnat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2 > Re: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-09/msg00009.html > > Implements the suggested inlining. I also removed some dead code. > This doesn't fix yet the unwinder problem I reported in > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-07/msg00319.html > > I'll do that separately. > > 2004-09-01 Joel Brobecker > > * mips-tdep.c (linked_proc_desc_table): Delete, not used. > (mips_insn32_frame_cache): Inline call to find_proc_desc. > (find_proc_desc): Remove dead code. > > Tested on mips-irix 6.5, no regression. > OK to apply? Ok, feel free to commit any similar simplifications / inlineings. thanks! Andrew