From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21374 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2004 18:01:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21358 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2004 18:01:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 1 Sep 2004 18:01:20 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i81I1KS0012197 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 14:01:20 -0400 Received: from pobox.toronto.redhat.com (pobox.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.4]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i81I1J309344; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 14:01:20 -0400 Received: from touchme.toronto.redhat.com (IDENT:postfix@touchme.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.9]) by pobox.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i81I1Hse021846; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 14:01:19 -0400 Received: from redhat.com (toocool.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.72]) by touchme.toronto.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB158001FC; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 14:01:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <41360E6D.5040702@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 18:01:00 -0000 From: Jeff Johnston User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Eli Zaretskii , drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA]: Fix for pending breakpoints in manually loaded/unloaded shlibs References: <41191D71.60204@redhat.com> <20040811171203.GA4152@nevyn.them.org> <411A7D97.50104@redhat.com> <20040818135621.GA26257@nevyn.them.org> <4123AC6E.8000300@redhat.com> <20040818193952.GA27639@nevyn.them.org> <4123B62C.6060703@redhat.com> <4135E722.2030401@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <4135E722.2030401@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00015.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney wrote: >>>> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:03:56 -0400 >>>> From: Jeff Johnston >>>> >>>> Eli, in light of what Daniel and Andrew have said regarding the >>>> value of having an observer, may I repost with changes and check the >>>> code in? >> >> >> >> I'm still unconvinced, but I won't veto it. > > > Jeff, the observer and use can be committed. > Thanks. Patches committed, including fix to the testcase. > Eli, I'm not sure what you're looking for here: > >> I'd like to see at least a couple more cases like this before I agree >> that a generalization is in order. > > can you expand a little? > > Andrew > > >