From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8383 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2004 02:27:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8359 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2004 02:27:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 1 Sep 2004 02:27:57 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i812RuS0021002 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 22:27:57 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i812Rt713893; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 22:27:55 -0400 Received: from redhat.com (dhcp-172-16-25-160.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.25.160]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i812RtV01035; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 19:27:55 -0700 Message-ID: <413533AA.2020502@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 02:27:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; es-ES; rv:1.4.2) Gecko/20040301 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney CC: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa/gdb.threads] Test static thread program References: <4118D96F.3080106@redhat.com> <411ABAD7.6020005@redhat.com> <411AC61E.1080700@gnu.org> <412EA2E7.3030608@redhat.com> <412F49A7.3080302@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <412F49A7.3080302@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00003.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney wrote: >> Andrew Cagney wrote: >> >>>> I really really appreciate the contribution of a static thread test. >>>> I'd like to know what specific failure mode(s) you're looking for. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> GDB's thread debugging does not work on GNU/Linux when the program is >>> linked statically. >> >> >> >> Well yes, I guessed that much. Can you be more specific? > > > Bug 1328 contains all the information I know, which at present isn't > much (I'm guessing that it is missing a thread library loaded event). > I've attached a gdb.log. All right, then since you're unwilling to do any non-linux testing, please check it in, and we'll deal with any problems if they come up.