From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2517 invoked by alias); 30 Aug 2004 18:06:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2505 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2004 18:05:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO barry.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.25) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 30 Aug 2004 18:05:58 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by barry.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1C1qXW-0005km-00; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 14:05:58 -0400 Received: from mindspring.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9BB034B102; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 14:06:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 18:06:00 -0000 From: Michael Chastain To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, cagney@gnu.org Subject: Re: [rfa/testsuite] Signals vs handler entry-point Message-ID: <41336C91.nailNDE1UBEQ0@mindspring.com> References: <41336710.2050801@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <41336710.2050801@gnu.org> User-Agent: nail 10.8 6/28/04 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00771.txt.bz2 Looks okay to me. This patch is approved, with a 24-hour delay for anyone else to object or ask for more time. === 2004-08-30 Andrew Cagney * gdb.base/sigstep.exp (breakpoint_to_handler_entry) (skip_to_handler_entry): New procedures. Test stepping into a handler when the breakpoint is at the handler's entry point.