From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23972 invoked by alias); 27 Aug 2004 14:14:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23941 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2004 14:14:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 27 Aug 2004 14:14:25 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7REEPS2021079 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:14:25 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i7REEJ311694; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:14:20 -0400 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 226D22B9D; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:13:10 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <412F4175.3060502@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 14:14:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040801 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Chastain Cc: jimb@redhat.com, david@streamline-computing.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFA] PR gdb/648 (eval.c approval reqd) References: <1091830216.4188.23.camel@localhost> <1092659964.5816.5.camel@localhost> <1093009988.5529.40.camel@cpc4-oxfd5-5-0-cust12.oxfd.cable.ntl.com> <1093599149.26156.19.camel@cpc4-oxfd5-5-0-cust12.oxfd.cable.ntl.com> <412F3C47.9060904@gnu.org> <412F3E1D.nailDK31KTUQZ@mindspring.com> In-Reply-To: <412F3E1D.nailDK31KTUQZ@mindspring.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00734.txt.bz2 > Andrew Cagney wrote: > >>> Where were we at with the testcase? I've a fuzzy memory of it hitting a >>> problem with test infrastructure? > > > Yeah, big time. > > There are no FORTRAN programs in the test suite. > > Before I add any FORTRAN programs, I am going to overhaul the code > that connects "language type" (such as c or f77) to "compiler name" > (such as gcc or g77). > > I've started that twice now, but it's a big ball of hair. Is there anything we can do in the interum. Even a gdb.fortran tmp-hack to run fortran directly? Once the infrastructure is in place, that can easily be replaced. Its important that, as these new language features get added, the tests demonstrating that they work, also get included. Andrew