From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18593 invoked by alias); 24 Aug 2004 19:10:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18586 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2004 19:10:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp6.mindspring.com) (207.69.200.110) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 24 Aug 2004 19:10:37 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by smtp6.mindspring.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1Bzgge-0005Vu-00; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 15:10:28 -0400 Received: from mindspring.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 437AD4B102; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 15:10:27 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 19:10:00 -0000 From: Michael Chastain To: jjohnstn@redhat.com, drow@false.org Subject: Re: [RFA]: Java Inferior Call Take 3 Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: <412B92A2.nailEVP11TZ9M@mindspring.com> References: <40A9264C.4060404@redhat.com> <20040617030603.GC23443@nevyn.them.org> <40D20494.2020608@redhat.com> <20040619235857.GA18759@nevyn.them.org> <16598.64375.217285.743094@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <16601.25623.949217.642524@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <20040623134742.GA24612@nevyn.them.org> <40D9FC3B.3030700@redhat.com> <20040623230138.GA6426@nevyn.them.org> <40EB1DDD.4070603@redhat.com> <20040816203502.GB14885@nevyn.them.org> <412B8EA3.3090406@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <412B8EA3.3090406@redhat.com> User-Agent: nail 10.8 6/28/04 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00657.txt.bz2 Jeff Johnston wrote: > gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > 2004-08-24 Jeff Johnston > > * gdb.java/jprint.exp: New test for java inferior call. > * gdb.java/jprint.java: Ditto. Bleagh, my bad, gdb.java doesn't belong to me. It belongs to Anthony Green, who delegated authority to Andrew Cagney a few months ago. Well I have no objection to this part of this patch.