From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15408 invoked by alias); 24 Aug 2004 19:05:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15357 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2004 19:05:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO barry.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.25) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 24 Aug 2004 19:05:42 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by barry.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1Bzgbz-0006z1-00; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 15:05:39 -0400 Received: from mindspring.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A24B4B102; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 15:05:38 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 19:05:00 -0000 From: Michael Chastain To: jjohnstn@redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA]: Java Inferior Call Take 3 Cc: drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: <412B9181.nailEP511GLS6@mindspring.com> References: <40A9264C.4060404@redhat.com> <20040617030603.GC23443@nevyn.them.org> <40D20494.2020608@redhat.com> <20040619235857.GA18759@nevyn.them.org> <16598.64375.217285.743094@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <16601.25623.949217.642524@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <20040623134742.GA24612@nevyn.them.org> <40D9FC3B.3030700@redhat.com> <20040623230138.GA6426@nevyn.them.org> <40EB1DDD.4070603@redhat.com> <20040816203502.GB14885@nevyn.them.org> <412B8EA3.3090406@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <412B8EA3.3090406@redhat.com> User-Agent: nail 10.8 6/28/04 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00656.txt.bz2 The test script + test program look pretty good to me. What system(s) did you test it on? > 2004-08-24 Jeff Johnston > > * gdb.java/jprint.exp: New test for java inferior call. > * gdb.java/jprint.java: Ditto.