From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28755 invoked by alias); 21 Aug 2004 08:36:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28667 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2004 08:35:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO tisch.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.157) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 21 Aug 2004 08:35:59 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by tisch.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1ByRLy-0001OH-00; Sat, 21 Aug 2004 04:35:58 -0400 Received: from mindspring.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BD7864B102; Sat, 21 Aug 2004 04:36:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 08:36:00 -0000 From: Michael Chastain To: kettenis@chello.nl Subject: Re: [RFC] gdb_ptrace.h Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: <41270985.nailLDC113BMN@mindspring.com> References: <200408132153.i7DLr1gF012138@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <411D3C25.nailH6I31CLNM@mindspring.com> <200408210754.i7L7sRrE034170@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <200408210754.i7L7sRrE034170@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> User-Agent: nail 10.8 6/28/04 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00602.txt.bz2 Mark Kettenis wrote: > All three of them, and hopefully everything before 10.20 too. That's > why I think HP-UX without a version number is more appropriate. But then someone comes along in 2006 and wonders whether it applies to hpux 11.23 or not. That's why I like to use version numbers when I've observed something. -- Just my opinion, though.