Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: Manoj Iyer <manjo@austin.ibm.com>
Cc: gilliam@us.ibm.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] New thread testcase.
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 16:04:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <411B94E1.30803@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0408101503500.30104@lazy>

> oh! sorry abt that... got confused btwn 'bugs'...
> 
> The kernel bug was causing gdb to fail when passing a 32bit address to the
> kernel.  this was causing 32 bit gdb to fail in linux_test_for_tracefork()
> by always returning second_pid = 0 in the PTRACE_GETEVENTMSG call.
> 
> this resulted in linux_enable_event_reporting() not setting the PTRACE
> fork options for the pid and then the thread never received a SIGSTOP.
> 
> John Engel, kernel developer, debugged and fixed this problem in the
> kernel after we reported this GDB problem to him...
> 
> So, when you debug a multi-threaded app with 32bit GDB on a PPC64 system,
> and you set a break point at the thread function and tried to step, you
> get the message "reading register pc (#64): No such process." for example:

Ewww!  Yes, very good test, should have exercised this [not so] edge 
case years ago.

One tweak, can the sleep(100) be avoided, instead using synchronization 
primatives?  That way its clear that the test runs at full speed.

Andrew



  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-12 16:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-09 22:18 [patch/testsuite/mi/copyright] gdb.mi/mi2-*.exp: update copyright years Michael Chastain
2004-08-10  6:10 ` [RFC] New thread testcase Manoj Iyer
2004-08-10  7:24   ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-10 15:13     ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-10 20:22       ` Manoj Iyer
2004-08-10 20:33         ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-10 20:44           ` Manoj Iyer
2004-08-12 16:04             ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2004-08-27  3:25             ` Michael Snyder
2004-08-27 13:48               ` Manoj Iyer
2004-08-10 20:13     ` Manoj Iyer
2004-08-12  0:26   ` Michael Snyder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=411B94E1.30803@gnu.org \
    --to=cagney@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=gilliam@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=manjo@austin.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox